Military contracts aren’t just paperwork—they’re a high-stakes game of economics, law, and tech wizardry. They spell out what’s being ordered—whether it’s a stockpile of ammo or cutting-edge weapon systems—and dictate how the state and contractor tango. At the core? Accountability: for the cash burned, the quality of the gear, and delivery deadlines that, in wartime, can mean life or death.
In the U.S., where defense procurement is a finely tuned machine decades in the making, contracts are sorted by three big markers: what’s being bought, how the price is set and paid, and the process of signing and oversight. It’s getting trickier every year—modern tech like drones, missile arrays, and cyber tools comes with risks that have to be baked into the deal from day one.
Read more: The Reality of Trump's Halt on Arms Assistance to Ukraine: What's the Difference Between Programs and Will USAI Save the Day?
America boils it all down to two main flavors: fixed-price contracts and cost-reimbursement deals, each with a slew of spin-offs tailored to the mission. Fixed-price gigs range from the no-nonsense “set it and forget it” type—where the contractor eats all risks and the government pays a flat fee—to fancier versions where prices slide with inflation or get a bonus boost for hitting targets. Here’s the lineup:
- Firm Fixed Price: Simple—contractor shoulders the risk, government pays the agreed sum, done.
- Fixed Price with Redetermination: Price gets a tweak after the job’s done if costs shift up or down.
- Fixed Price with Incentives: Extra cash flows if they deliver fast or exceed specs.
Cost-reimbursement contracts flip the script: the government foots the bill for the contractor’s expenses, often tossing in perks to keep them sharp. Options include:
- Straight Cost Coverage: Pay for what’s spent, no frills.
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee: Contractor gets a profit slice, win or lose.
- Cost Plus Incentives: Bonuses for saving time, money, or smashing performance goals.
Then there’s the wild card group—special contracts. Think deals with no set deadline or volume, ordered “as needed,” or long-term “master agreements” with trusted partners. This flexibility lets the U.S. pivot fast, from fuel runs to space-age breakthroughs.
What’s This Mean for Ukraine?
Ukraine’s in the fight of its life against russian aggression, and every second counts. Here, the U.S. contract playbook isn’t just a neat idea—it’s a survival guide.
Fixed Price for the Basics
Fixed-price contracts are gold for snagging standard gear: bullets, spare parts, vests, or off-the-shelf drones. In the U.S., these lock in a price, and the contractor takes the hit if costs spiral. For Ukraine, it’s clarity in chaos—we know the tab upfront, no surprises. Picture this: the government puts out a call for 10,000 shells at $5 million. Local plant or foreign firm, they’ve got to hit that mark and deliver on time—or tough luck. It forces efficiency and gives Ukraine budget predictability when every hryvnia’s a lifeline.
Cost Reimbursement for Game-Changers
War’s not just about bullets—it’s about breakthroughs. Ukraine needs next-level stuff: strike drones, air defense grids, electronic warfare kits to jam russian tech. Enter cost-reimbursement contracts, U.S.-style. The state covers the contractor’s tab (R&D, testing, you name it) but sweetens the pot with rewards for results. Say a drone maker gets a 10% bonus if their bird flies farther or hits harder. It’s a nudge for firms to tackle bold, risky projects that’d be “too pricey” in peacetime.
The catch? These deals can bleed money—America’s learned that the hard way. Ukraine needs ironclad oversight: crystal-clear specs, weekly reports, independent audits. Ordering an EW system? The Ministry should track every penny, from engineer wages to circuit boards.
Hybrid Hustle and Rewards
Why not mix it up? The U.S. loves sprinkling incentives into both models. A contractor fixes tanks at a fixed rate but scores a bonus for beating the clock. Or they build missiles with cost coverage, pocketing extra for pinpoint accuracy. For Ukraine, this could be a game-changer.
Flexibility for the Fog of War
War’s messy. One day it’s fuel, the next it’s drones, then comms gear. That’s where “indefinite delivery” contracts shine, U.S.-style. The government signs a deal: “We’ll buy as needed, up to 10 million hryvnias.” Stockpiles grow fast, no rigid quotas. For Ukraine—reliant on shaky foreign aid and unpredictable combat—this is a lifeline for staying nimble.
How Does Ukraine Make It Happen?
This isn’t a pipe dream—it’s doable, but it takes guts. First, legal muscle. The U.S. leans on the Federal Acquisition Regulation—hundreds of pages locking down everything from payments to penalties. Ukraine needs its own rulebook: a law that nails down contract terms, keeps it open, and sorts disputes fast. Second, watchdogs. The Ministry could spin up a “Defense Procurement Unit” with teeth—checking contractors, dissecting costs, and stomping out corruption, which gnaws at wartime budgets like rust.
Third, global teamwork. Some countries wobbly, but players like UK, France, the Nordics are in. Long-haul “master agreements” could lock in tech transfers, co-production, or training. It’s a step toward NATO specs, even if full membership’s a distant star.
The Hurdles—and the Fixes
Here’s the rub: the U.S. has a trillion-dollar war chest and a humming industrial base. Ukraine’s broke, and aid swings like a pendulum. Solutions? One, co-funding—team up with Nordics or UK on a missile project, splitting costs and risks. Two, tap the private sector—Ukrainian firms are hungry if the state offers guarantees and carrots.
The Plan: Ukraine’s Next Move
The U.S. contract system isn’t bureaucracy—it’s a victory toolkit. Ukraine should cherry-pick and tweak it: fixed prices for essentials to save cash and speed delivery; cost-plus incentives for innovations to outsmart the enemy; flexible deals to roll with war’s punches. It all rides on tight oversight, smart alliances, and creative funding.
The Ministry could kick off a trial run: fixed-price ammo, cost-reimbursed drones, flexible med supplies. Six months later, check the scoreboard—what flies, what flops. Then scale it nationwide.
Author: Viktor Plakhuta
Viktor Plakhuta has 10 years of experience in security and defense sector working in government (two ministries), Presidential Office, Parliamentary CMTE on Security and Defense, and collaborating with non-governmental organizations. Interests - strategy (grand strategy), international relations, policymaking.
Read more: After Setbacks in Ukraine, the U.S. Makes New 'GLSDB 2.0' Bomb That Should Fix the Problem
